revolution
i saw kaalbela today, not that its an exceptional movie or anything...but it made me finally sit and write this down, sort of organize my thoughts and...
well i have been thinking about this for long... wondering about what really happened back then? it has always intrigued me you know, and i have read quite a few books but they were all works of fiction. it seems to me at times that there is this conspiracy of silence as far as the movement of the late sixties is concerned. there is a huge cover up happening somewhere. the movement, the involvement of the students, the repressive action of the state--it was a huge thing. thousands were killed, tortured, imprisoned, raped, maimed for life... and yet as far as i am aware there has been very little research on this.
as i mentioned before, kaalbela, haajaar churaashi-r maa, ontorghaat, honyomaan these are all works of fiction. what about documentary history? there is nothing... nothing... the history we are taught in school ends on the 15th of august 1947. as if since then the history of our nation has been uneventful. and we have sort of "lived happily ever after".
i think the concept of our nationhood, the illusion of unity in diversity ended with independence. with the common foreign enemy gone all the age old domestic demons reared there heads right back up. and new ones are born every day.
anyway, i digress. what is it about the naxalite movement that makes it a taboo subject even today.? till date the people of the previous generation only whisper vaguely that this or that person in the para was a nokshaal. was the repression so savage that people are still afraid to talk about it? but how could they unleash such barbaric violence upon their own people? i mean this kids were scarcely out of school...their tormentors were people they knew, people of the same nation, spoke the same language, maybe had been to the same schools and colleges as their parents, lived in the same localities...
my own sympathies are ambivalent. these kids...they were my age...and...yet they seem (when i read these books or watch these movies) so much older... and there is a kind of idealism thats infectious, inspiring...that makes me want to spit on my compromising existence. at other times i feel they were fools, at other times i feel its me who is older by far, more mature, more cynical albeit a lesser human being. always a lesser human being.
it does not matter today whether they were wise or foolish.
what matters is, as animesh kept asking dipak, were they right or wrong? right or wrong? right in their ideals and wrong in their actions?is affirmative action, however misguided, better than this indolence, this lethargic indifference? is revolution so easy? does not violence always, always, always inevitably beget violence? how could they have not foreseen it?
then again, two decades earlier., when student revolutionaries were practising the politics of violence to get rid of foreign oppression, that was ok. that was laudable. and then all of a sudden, protesting against the oppression of an indigenous government became a crime severe enough to incur the wrath of the savagely retributive state machinery. why?
i don't know. i don't think one can ever know beyond all doubt.
but one can know facts. one can know history. and their history needs to be written.
and somewhere deep down i have a feeling that the only reason we are romanticizing and valourising their quest today, in books and movies, the only reason we sympathise with them, is because they lost. had they won, things would not have been different. not really. its perhaps for the best that they lost. had they won, the disillusionment would have been infinitely greater.
well i have been thinking about this for long... wondering about what really happened back then? it has always intrigued me you know, and i have read quite a few books but they were all works of fiction. it seems to me at times that there is this conspiracy of silence as far as the movement of the late sixties is concerned. there is a huge cover up happening somewhere. the movement, the involvement of the students, the repressive action of the state--it was a huge thing. thousands were killed, tortured, imprisoned, raped, maimed for life... and yet as far as i am aware there has been very little research on this.
as i mentioned before, kaalbela, haajaar churaashi-r maa, ontorghaat, honyomaan these are all works of fiction. what about documentary history? there is nothing... nothing... the history we are taught in school ends on the 15th of august 1947. as if since then the history of our nation has been uneventful. and we have sort of "lived happily ever after".
i think the concept of our nationhood, the illusion of unity in diversity ended with independence. with the common foreign enemy gone all the age old domestic demons reared there heads right back up. and new ones are born every day.
anyway, i digress. what is it about the naxalite movement that makes it a taboo subject even today.? till date the people of the previous generation only whisper vaguely that this or that person in the para was a nokshaal. was the repression so savage that people are still afraid to talk about it? but how could they unleash such barbaric violence upon their own people? i mean this kids were scarcely out of school...their tormentors were people they knew, people of the same nation, spoke the same language, maybe had been to the same schools and colleges as their parents, lived in the same localities...
my own sympathies are ambivalent. these kids...they were my age...and...yet they seem (when i read these books or watch these movies) so much older... and there is a kind of idealism thats infectious, inspiring...that makes me want to spit on my compromising existence. at other times i feel they were fools, at other times i feel its me who is older by far, more mature, more cynical albeit a lesser human being. always a lesser human being.
it does not matter today whether they were wise or foolish.
what matters is, as animesh kept asking dipak, were they right or wrong? right or wrong? right in their ideals and wrong in their actions?is affirmative action, however misguided, better than this indolence, this lethargic indifference? is revolution so easy? does not violence always, always, always inevitably beget violence? how could they have not foreseen it?
then again, two decades earlier., when student revolutionaries were practising the politics of violence to get rid of foreign oppression, that was ok. that was laudable. and then all of a sudden, protesting against the oppression of an indigenous government became a crime severe enough to incur the wrath of the savagely retributive state machinery. why?
i don't know. i don't think one can ever know beyond all doubt.
but one can know facts. one can know history. and their history needs to be written.
and somewhere deep down i have a feeling that the only reason we are romanticizing and valourising their quest today, in books and movies, the only reason we sympathise with them, is because they lost. had they won, things would not have been different. not really. its perhaps for the best that they lost. had they won, the disillusionment would have been infinitely greater.